A prospective comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and 51Cr-EDTA clearance for glomerular filtration rate measurement in 42 kidney transplant recipients.

Affiliation

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Service de Néphrologie, Transplantation, Dialyse - Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin, France; Univ. Bordeaux, IMB, UMR CNRS 5251, F-33400, Talence, France; INRIA Bordeaux Sud-Ouest, MONC Team, FF-33400, Talence, France. Electronic address: [Email]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE : To evaluate the performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) compared with the reference standard technique of urinary clearance of 51Cr-EDTA.
METHODS : All kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with an indication for non-urgent contrast-enhanced MRI at our institution were prospectively included between 2008 and 2012. Renographies were acquired by low-dose dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) then fitted with a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. MR-GFR was compared with reference isotopic measurements using Bland-Altman diagrams, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance rates.
RESULTS : Forty-two KTRs (mean age 51.5 years, 26-74) were analyzed. Mean estimated GFR was 48.5 ± 27 mL/min/1.73m2 (24-178 mL/min). The mean bias was +13.2 mL/min (6.4-20.0, +36.9%) ranging from -31.0 mL/min (-41.7%) to +101.4 mL/min (+89.2%) with a large variability (standard-deviation: 22.3 mL/min; limits of agreement: [-30.6 (-43.3--18.9); +57.0 (45.3-68.7)]). The ICC was 0.32 (0.02-0.56) and the concordance rate was 28.6% (14.9-42.2).
CONCLUSIONS : The large variability of MR-GFR compared with the reference technique precludes its use in KTRs, whose anatomical peculiarities make standardization of arterial input function (AIF) difficult.

Keywords

Data accuracy,Functional MRI,Glomerular filtration rate,Kidney transplant,

OUR Recent Articles