Cuevas H(1), Heitkemper E(2), Huang YC(3), Jang DE(2), García AA(2), Zuñiga JA(2). Author information:
(1)The University of Texas at Austin, School of Nursing, USA. Electronic
address: [Email]
(2)The University of Texas at Austin, School of Nursing, USA.
(3)Texas State University, St. David's School of Nursing, USA.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this review are to (1) describe the state of the science of patient activation interventions for the self-management of chronic conditions; (2) identify effective intervention elements for improving patient activation; and (3) compare intervention effectiveness across chronic conditions. METHODS: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA). PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases were searched. RESULTS: Thirty-two articles published between 2005 and 2019 were identified with intervention elements of self-management, disease management, and education. Meta-analysis of a subset of seven randomized controlled trials (n = 7) that used the 13-item version of the Patient Activation Measure with data collection points at 6 months demonstrated that patient activation did not change significantly in comparison with controls (MD = 0.25, 95 % CI = 0.02-0.47). CONCLUSION: Most interventions reported significant improvement in patient activation and were linked to tasks such as regular exercise and monitoring glucose. However, the meta-analysis of RCTs did not confirm these findings. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Patient activation can be assessed and addressed uniformly across all chronic conditions to improve patient engagement in care.
OUR JOURNALS
Having over 250 Research scholars worldwide and more than 400 articles online with open access.
