Zhang Z(1), Wu Y(2), Zhong C(2), Zhou X(2), Liu C(2), Li Q(2), Chen R(2), Gao Q(2), Li X(2), Zhang H(2), Zhang Y(2), Cui W(2), Hao L(2), Wei S(3), Yang X(4), Yang N(5). Author information:
(1)Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Hubei Key Laboratory of Food
Nutrition and Safety, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong
University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Department of
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of
Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College,
Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
(2)Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Hubei Key Laboratory of Food
Nutrition and Safety, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong
University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
(3)Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key
Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical
College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
(4)Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Hubei Key Laboratory of Food
Nutrition and Safety, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong
University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. Electronic address:
[Email]
(5)Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Hubei Key Laboratory of Food
Nutrition and Safety, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong
University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. Electronic address:
[Email]
OBJECTIVE: Information is limited regarding the possible relationship between diet-related inflammation and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study investigated the association between the inflammatory potential of the diet, measured by the dietary inflammatory index (DII), and GDM risk in pregnant Chinese women. METHODS: This study included 2639 eligible women from the Tongji Maternal and Child Health Cohort. Dietary intake was assessed by a validated semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire and was used to calculate the DII score. The DII was then validated using C-reactive protein measurements in a subsample of 133 pregnant women. GDM diagnoses were collected from medical records based on the results of a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test at 24 to 28 wk gestation. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were performed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for GDM risk by DII score, modeled continuously and in tertiles. RESULTS: Of the 2639 participants, 13.1% were diagnosed with GDM. DII scores ranged from -4.45 to 3.15 and were positively associated with C-reactive protein (adjusted β : 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16, 2.40; P trend = 0.023) when comparing DII tertile 3 (most pro-inflammatory) to tertile 1 (most anti-inflammatory). A significant and positive association was observed between DII scores and GDM risk (adjusted OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.95; P trend = 0.022) comparing the highest versus lowest tertiles. The stratified analysis showed that this association was stronger in pregnant women who were overweight or obese before pregnancy (adjusted OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.03, 4.69). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a higher DII score, corresponding to a more proinflammatory diet, is associated with a higher risk of GDM, particularly in pregnant women who were overweight or obese before pregnancy.
OUR JOURNALS
Having over 250 Research scholars worldwide and more than 400 articles online with open access.