Mitochondria-targeted phenolic antioxidants induce ROS-protective pathways in primary human skin fibroblasts.

Affiliation

Teixeira J(1), Basit F(2), Willems PHGM(2), Wagenaars JA(2), van de Westerlo E(2), Amorim R(3), Cagide F(4), Benfeito S(4), Oliveira C(4), Borges F(4), Oliveira PJ(5), Koopman WJH(6).
Author information:
(1)CNC - Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, UC-Biotech, Biocant Park, 3060-197, Cantanhede, Portugal; CIQUP/Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto
(UP), 4169-007, Porto, Portugal; Department of Biochemistry, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: [Email]
(2)Department of Biochemistry, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
(3)CNC - Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, UC-Biotech, Biocant Park, 3060-197, Cantanhede, Portugal; CIQUP/Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto
(UP), 4169-007, Porto, Portugal.
(4)CIQUP/Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto
(UP), 4169-007, Porto, Portugal.
(5)CNC - Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, UC-Biotech, Biocant Park, 3060-197, Cantanhede, Portugal.
(6)Department of Biochemistry, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: [Email]

Abstract

Phytochemical antioxidants like gallic and caffeic acid are constituents of the normal human diet that display beneficial health effects, potentially via activating stress response pathways. Using primary human skin fibroblasts (PHSFs) as a model, we here investigated whether such pathways were induced by novel mitochondria-targeted variants of gallic acid (AntiOxBEN2) and caffeic acid (AntiOxCIN4). Both molecules reduced cell viability with similar kinetics and potency (72 h incubation, IC50 ~23 μM). At a relatively high but non-toxic concentration (12.5 μM), AntiOxBEN2 and AntiOxCIN4 increased ROS levels (at 24 h), followed by a decline (at 72 h). Further analysis at the 72 h timepoint demonstrated that AntiOxBEN2 and AntiOxCIN4 did not alter mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψ), but increased cellular glutathione (GSH) levels, mitochondrial NAD(P)H autofluorescence, and mitochondrial superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) protein levels. In contrast, cytosolic SOD1 protein levels were not affected. AntiOxBEN2 and AntiOxCIN4 both stimulated the gene expression of Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2; a master regulator of the cellular antioxidant response toward oxidative stress). AntiOxBEN2 and ANtiOxCIN4 differentially affected the gene expression of the antioxidants Heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX1) and NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (quinone) 1 (NQO1). Both antioxidants did not protect from cell death induced by GSH depletion and AntiOxBEN2 (but not AntiOxCIN4) antagonized hydrogen peroxide-induced cell death. We conclude that AntiOxBEN2 and AntiOxCIN4 increase ROS levels, which stimulates NRF2 expression and, as a consequence, SOD2 and GSH levels. This highlights that AntiOxBEN2 and AntiOxCIN4 can act as prooxidants thereby activating endogenous ROS-protective pathways.